Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547475›Full record

ArticleJournal of developmental biology2022

The Development of the

Jacob B Pears, Carley Tillett, Rui Tahara, Hans C E Larsson, Kate Trinajstic, Catherine A Boisvert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of developmental biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacob B PearsSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Carley TillettHub for Immersive Visualisation and eResearch, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3854-8816
Rui TaharaRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0C4, Canada.
Hans C E LarssonRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0C4, Canada.
Kate TrinajsticSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Catherine A BoisvertSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0618-7270
Curtin University · AUMcGill University · CAAustralian Museum · AU

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship Jacob PearsAustralian Research Council 1096002Canadian foundation of Innovation 33122Curtin Research Fellowship Catherine Boisvert
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic girdles, fins and claspers are evolutionary novelties first recorded in jawed vertebrates. Over the course of the evolution of chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fish) two trends in the morphology of the pelvic skeleton have been suggested to have occurred. These evolutionary shifts involved both an enlargement of the metapterygium (basipterygium) and a transition of fin radial articulation from the pelvic girdle to the metapterygium. To determine how these changes in morphology have occurred it is essential to understand the development of extant taxa as this can indicate potential developmental mechanisms that may have been responsible for these changes. The study of the morphology of the appendicular skeleton across development in chondrichthyans is almost entirely restricted to the historical literature with little contemporary research. Here, we have examined the morphology and development of the pelvic skeleton of a holocephalan chondrichthyan, the elephant shark (

Indexed as

chimaeroidchondrichthyescladoselachepelvic girdleskeletal development

Identifiers

PMID36547475
PMCPMC9782884
OpenAlexW4312127806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.