Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547465›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022

Prognostic Value of Combined Radiomic Features from Follow-Up DWI and T2-FLAIR in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Alessia Gerbasi, Praneeta Konduri, Manon Tolhuisen, Fabiano Cavalcante, Leon Rinkel, Manon Kappelhof, Lennard Wolff, Jonathan M Coutinho, Bart J Emmer, Vincent Costalat and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessia GerbasiDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, 27100 PV Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-1777
Praneeta KonduriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon TolhuisenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-1117
Fabiano CavalcanteDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leon RinkelDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon KappelhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lennard WolffDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonathan M CoutinhoDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-4037
Vincent CostalatDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34400 Montpellier, France.
Caroline ArquizanDepartment of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, 34400 Montpellier, France.
Jeannette HofmeijerDepartment of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6836 BH Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Maarten UyttenboogaartDepartment of Neurology and Department of Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wim van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-7056
Yvo RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Silvana QuagliniDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, 27100 PV Pavia, Italy.
Riccardo BellazziDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, 27100 PV Pavia, Italy.
Charles MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN-NO IV Trial Investigators (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in The Netherlands)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Pavia · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

CONTRAST CVON2015-01: CONTRASTINSIST 77072Ministry of Economic Affairs LSHM17016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological pathways involved in lesion formation after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are poorly understood. Despite successful reperfusion treatment, up to two thirds of patients with large vessel occlusion remain functionally dependent. Imaging characteristics extracted from DWI and T2-FLAIR follow-up MR sequences could aid in providing a better understanding of the lesion constituents. We built a fully automated pipeline based on a tree ensemble machine learning model to predict poor long-term functional outcome in patients from the MR CLEAN-NO IV trial. Several feature sets were compared, considering only imaging, only clinical, or both types of features. Nested cross-validation with grid search and a feature selection procedure based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to train and validate the models. Considering features from both imaging modalities in combination with clinical characteristics led to the best prognostic model (AUC = 0.85, 95%CI [0.81, 0.89]). Moreover, SHAP values showed that imaging features from both sequences have a relevant impact on the final classification, with texture heterogeneity being the most predictive imaging biomarker. This study suggests the prognostic value of both DWI and T2-FLAIR follow-up sequences for AIS patients. If combined with clinical characteristics, they could lead to better understanding of lesion pathophysiology and improved long-term functional outcome prediction.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokeensemble tree classifierexplainable AIfunctional independenceimaging bio-markersmachine learningSHAP

Identifiers

PMID36547465
PMCPMC9786822
OpenAlexW4312140892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.