ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
A Critical Evaluation of Patient Pathways and Missed Opportunities in Treatment for Heart Failure.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Differences in Hospitalizations in the 6 Months Before a Diagnosis of Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessment of adherence to treatment recommendations among patients with heart failure: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Missed Opportunities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Review
- A Qualitative Study of the Limits and Possibilities of Integrating Palliative Care in Heart Failure.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- The importance of pathways to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiac amyloidosis.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a global problem responsible for significant morbidity and mortality.
methodsThis review describes the patient pathways and missed opportunities related to treatment for patients with HF.
resultsThe contemporary management strategies in HF, including medical therapies, device therapy, transplant, and palliative care. Despite the strong evidence base for therapies that improve prognosis and symptoms, there remains a large number of patients that are not optimally managed. The treatment of patients with HF is highly influenced by those who are caring for them and varies widely across geographical regions. HF patients can be broadly classified into two key groups: those who have known HF, and those who are incidentally found to have reduced left ventricular systolic dysfunction or other cardiac abnormality when an echocardiogram is performed. While all patients are under the care of a general practitioner or family doctor, in other instances, non-cardiologist physicians, cardiologists, and specialist HF nurses-each will have varying levels of expertise in managing HF-are part of the broader team involved in the specialist management of patients with HF.
conclusionsThere are many potential missed opportunities in HF treatment, which include general opportunities, medications, etiology-specific therapy, device therapy, therapies when initial treatments fail, and palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.