Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547427›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022

Development of Prediction Models for Acute Myocardial Infarction at Prehospital Stage with Machine Learning Based on a Nationwide Database.

Arom Choi, Min Joung Kim, Ji Min Sung, Sunhee Kim, Jayoung Lee, Heejung Hyun, Hyeon Chang Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Connected Network for EMS Comprehensive Technical Support Using Artificial Intelligence Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Research in Rhinology.American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arom ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0262-3370
Min Joung KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-5209
Ji Min SungDepartment of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Sunhee KimCONNECT-AI Research Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Jayoung LeeAITRICS, Seoul 06627, Republic of Korea.
Heejung HyunAITRICS, Seoul 06627, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-7945
Hyeon Chang KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-1240
Ji Hoon KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0070-9568
Hyuk-Jae ChangDepartment of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6139-7545
Connected Network for EMS Comprehensive Technical Support Using Artificial Intelligence Investigators

Funding

Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning S1015-19-1001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models for predicting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at the prehospital stage were developed and their efficacy compared, based on variables identified from a nationwide systematic emergency medical service (EMS) registry using conventional statistical methods and machine learning algorithms. Patients in the EMS cardiovascular registry aged >15 years who were transferred from the public EMS to emergency departments in Korea from January 2016 to December 2018 were enrolled. Two datasets were constructed according to the hierarchical structure of the registry. A total of 184,577 patients (Dataset 1) were included in the final analysis. Among them, 72,439 patients (Dataset 2) were suspected to have AMI at prehospital stage. Between the models derived using the conventional logistic regression method, the B-type model incorporated AMI-specific variables from the A-type model and exhibited a superior discriminative ability (p = 0.02). The models that used extreme gradient boosting and a multilayer perceptron yielded a higher predictive performance than the conventional logistic regression-based models for analyses that used both datasets. Each machine learning algorithm yielded different classification lists of the 10 most important features. Therefore, prediction models that use nationwide prehospital data and are developed with appropriate structures can improve the identification of patients who require timely AMI management.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionmachine learningnationwide prehospital recordprediction

Identifiers

PMID36547427
PMCPMC9784963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.