Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547283›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Rationally Designed Oral DOX Gels for Colon-Specific Administration.

Jie Li, Luping Ma, Cheng Wang, Pengju Jiang, Pengfei Cui, Jianhao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie LiSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.
Luping MaSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.
Cheng WangSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-3027
Pengju JiangSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.
Pengfei CuiSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-0202
Jianhao WangSchool of Pharmacy, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.
Changzhou University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of death from cancer in both men and women. Traditional CRC dosage forms deliver the drug to both desired and unwanted sites of drug action, resulting in a number of negative side effects. Chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents are being targeted and delivered directly to the colon and rectum using targeted oral drug delivery systems. The main challenge in successfully targeting drugs to the colon via the oral route is avoiding drug absorption/degradation in the stomach and small intestine before the dosage form reaches the colon. In this study, we employed biocompatible chalk to adsorb DOX, then mixed pectin and cross-linked with calcium ions to form PC-DOX gels. The presence of cross-linked pectin and chalk can provide dual protection for the drug, significantly reducing drug leakage in gastric acid. In vitro release results showed that the designed PC-DOX could achieve 68% colon delivery efficiency. In the simulated colon environment, the released semi-degradable chalk did not affect the uptake of doxorubicin by colon cancer cells. Finally, in vivo simulation experiments in mice showed that rationally designed PC-DOX could achieve the highest colonic delivery efficiency. Our strategy has great potential for application in the treatment of colon cancer.

Indexed as

chalkDOXoralpectin

Identifiers

PMID36547283
PMCPMC9777853
OpenAlexW4309692316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.