Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547120›Full record

ReviewClinics and practice2022

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?

Dimitrios Symeonidis, Konstantinos Tepetes, George Tzovaras, Labrini Kissa, Athina A Samara, Effrosyni Bompou, Dimitrios Zacharoulis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitrios SymeonidisDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Konstantinos TepetesDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9435-6849
George TzovarasDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Labrini KissaDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Athina A SamaraDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6177-7281
Effrosyni BompouDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios ZacharoulisDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
University Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with a rather dismal 5-year overall survival. The liver is the most commonly affected organ. Improved 5-year survival rates after successful hepatic resections for metastases confined to the liver have been reported. Certainly, a hepatectomy that results in an incomplete tumor resection, in terms of leaving macroscopic residual tumor in the future liver remnant, is not associated with survival benefits. However, the prognostic implications of a microscopically positive surgical margin or a clear margin of less than 1 mm (R1) on pathology are debatable. Although it has been a field of extensive research, the relevant literature often reports contradictory results. The purpose of the present study was to define, assess the risk factors for, and, ultimately, analyze the effect that an R1 hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases might have on local recurrence rates and long-term prognosis by reviewing the relevant literature. Achieving an R0 hepatic resection, optimally with more than 1 mm of clear margin, should always be the goal. However, in the era of the aggressive multimodality treatment of liver metastatic colorectal cancer, an R1 resection might be the cost of increasing the pool of patients finally eligible for resection. The majority of literature reports have highlighted the detrimental effect of R1 resections on local recurrence and overall survival. However, there are indeed studies that degraded the prognostic handicap as a consequence of an R1 resection in selected patients and highlighted the presence of RAS mutations, the response to chemotherapy, and, in general, factors that reflect the biology of the disease as important, if not the determinant, prognostic factors. In these patients, the aggressive disease biology seems to outperform the resection margin status as a prognostic factor, and the recorded differences between R1 and R0 resections are equalized. Properly and accurately defining this patient group is a future challenge in the field of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer liver metastasesR0 resectionR1 resectionresection margins

Identifiers

PMID36547120
PMCPMC9777184
OpenAlexW4312129898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.