Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36547026›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2022

Virtual and Augmented Reality versus Traditional Methods for Teaching Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

David Lucena-Anton, Juan Carlos Fernandez-Lopez, Ana I Pacheco-Serrano, Cristina Garcia-Munoz, Jose A Moral-Munoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Digital Competence of Rural Teachers in Depopulated Regions of Spain: A Bibliometric Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Undergraduate Skills Training in Pandemic Times: Where Is the Future of Medical Education?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  17. The Impact of a Training Program Based on Next-Generation Science Standards on Scientific Inquiry.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  18. Impact of Virtual Reality Cognitive and Motor Exercises on Brain Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Lucena-AntonDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-5342
Juan Carlos Fernandez-LopezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Ana I Pacheco-SerranoDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Cristina Garcia-MunozDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-2098
Jose A Moral-MunozDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-982X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of virtual worlds in health-related education is increasingly popular, but an overview of their use in physiotherapy education is still needed. The aim of this review was to analyse the use of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) compared to traditional methods for teaching physiotherapy. A systematic review was performed up to October 2022 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycInfo. The quality appraisal and risk of bias were assessed by the Joana Briggs Institute checklist and the Cochrane Collaboration's RoB Tool 2.0, respectively. A total of seven randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were included, involving 737 students. VR/AR-based teaching approaches included simulation and virtual worlds, and were conducted through immersive head-mounted displays, AR-based applications, and 3D visualisations. Three studies were focused on teaching anatomy content, two on clinical decision making skills, and the rest were focused on pathology, physiotherapy tasks or exercise performance, and movement analysis of lower limbs. Inconclusive results were found in terms of learning satisfaction and academic performance, showing VR/AR-based teaching models to be equally effective as traditional methods for teaching physiotherapy. We encourage researchers and teachers to include games in their VR/AR-based teaching approaches to enhance interaction and active learning in physiotherapy education.

Indexed as

augmented realityhigher educationinnovationphysiotherapyteachingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36547026
PMCPMC9778016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.