Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546983›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Examining the Flourishing Impacts of Repeated Visits to a Virtual Art Museum and the Role of Immersion.

Katherine N Cotter, Damien L Crone, Rebekah M Rodriguez-Boerwinkle, Martin Boerwinkle, Paul J Silvia, James O Pawelski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine N CotterPositive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-3645
Damien L CroneDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Rebekah M Rodriguez-BoerwinkleDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-1175
Martin BoerwinkleDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.
Paul J SilviaDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4597-328X
James O PawelskiPositive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3997-3478
University of North Carolina at Greensboro · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

National Endowment for the Arts 1862782-38-C-20Templeton Religion Trust TRT0154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visiting art museums has been associated with a range of flourishing outcomes. However, there have been recent shifts towards increasing digital engagement with art, leading to a radical change in how people experience visual art. Given the now expansive virtual art viewing options, it is important to understand whether digital engagement can also lead to greater flourishing, and, if so, under what conditions. We examined the flourishing effects of viewing art in a virtual gallery in a pre-registered experiment comprising four sessions over four weeks, with varying viewing instructions designed to increase immersion. Participants were recruited from a USA representative sample on Prolific, resulting in a final sample of 687 participants. People were randomly assigned to one of nine experimental conditions. Eight art viewing conditions involved four 15 min virtual gallery visits with viewing instructions varying on two factors: slow-looking and immersive mindset framing. An active control condition involved reading about (but not viewing) art. Participants completed a battery of baseline flourishing measures in week 1, completed experimental art engagement sessions during weeks 1-4, and completed the battery again in week 5. While immersion levels were greater in the viewing conditions than the reading condition, growth in flourishing did not differ across condition. Exploratory analyses, however, showed that immersion during the gallery visits did predict some changes in specific facets of flourishing (e.g., engagement, meaning, autonomy satisfaction). We suggest a number of possible explanations for these null results and point to what is needed in future research.

Indexed as

artflourishingimmersionvirtual artwell-being

Identifiers

PMID36546983
PMCPMC9774448
OpenAlexW4311857898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.