Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546979›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Maximizers' Susceptibility to the Effect of Frequency vs. Percentage Format in Risk Representation.

Raffaella Misuraca, Palmira Faraci, Costanza Scaffidi Abbate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raffaella MisuracaDepartment of Political Sciences and International Relations (DEMS), University of Palermo, 90134 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0008-944X
Palmira FaraciFaculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8011
Costanza Scaffidi AbbateDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-188X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study explored the susceptibility of maximizers to the effect of the specific information format-frequency vs. percentage-in a risk assessment task. One-hundred and fourteen participants were randomized into two experimental conditions: a frequency format and a percentage format. In both conditions, participants had to rate the level of risk that a mental patient would harm someone after his discharge from a mental health facility, based on the information reported in the psychologist's assessment for that patient. In the frequency condition, the information was presented in terms of frequencies, whereas in the percentage condition the same information was presented in terms of percentage. Our experiment showed that resolute maximizers are less affected by the specific format of the task than fearful maximizers. Thus, we conclude that resolute maximizers are more normative decision-makers. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Indexed as

decision-makingfrequency formatmaximizerspercentage formatrisk

Identifiers

PMID36546979
PMCPMC9774240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.