Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546976›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dimensions, Measures, and Contexts in Psychological Investigations of Curiosity: A Scoping Review.

Yong Jie Yow, Jonathan E Ramsay, Patrick K F Lin, Nigel V Marsh

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fueling Inquiry: Oncology Nurses Need Space to Wonder.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing Intellectual Virtues: The Virtuous Intellectual Character Scale (VICS).International journal of applied positive psychology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and Validation of the Curiosity of Climate Changes Scale.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong Jie YowSchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore.
Jonathan E RamsaySchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-9040
Patrick K F LinSchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1751-7287
Nigel V MarshSchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-6432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of curiosity as a construct has led to many conceptualisations, comprising of different dimensions. Due to this, various scales of curiosity have also been developed. Moreover, some researchers have conceived of curiosity as a general trait-like, while others have included contexts, such as the workplace, or education when investigating curiosity. This scoping review aims to scope the extant psychological literature on curiosity in order to better understand how it has been studied, specifically with regard to its dimensions, measures, and contexts. A total of 1194 records were identified, with 245 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the majority of curiosity research examined curiosity as having multiple dimensions and analysed the dimensions individually, with a deprivation-type curiosity playing the biggest role. The measure most commonly used was the Epistemic Curiosity Scale, which also consisted of a deprivation-type curiosity as one of the dimensions. Findings also implied that curiosity was most studied in the context of the workplace. Supplementary findings included a lack of representation of non-Western countries, as well as needing to cross-validate a recently developed curiosity scale. This scoping review represents a consolidation of the curiosity literature and how it can further prosper.

Indexed as

contexts of curiositycuriositydimensions of curiositymeasures of curiosity

Identifiers

PMID36546976
PMCPMC9774665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.