Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546926›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Biomechanical and Sensory Feedback Regularize the Behavior of Different Locomotor Central Pattern Generators.

Kaiyu Deng, Alexander J Hunt, Nicholas S Szczecinski, Matthew C Tresch, Hillel J Chiel, C J Heckman, Roger D Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kaiyu DengDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Alexander J HuntDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3820-4821
Nicholas S SzczecinskiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Matthew C TreschDepartments of Biomedical Engineering, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neuroscience, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Hillel J ChielDepartment of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1750-8500
C J HeckmanDepartments of Neuroscience, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Roger D QuinnDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · USNorthwestern University · USPortland State University · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1608111National Science Foundation DBI 2015317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents an in-depth numerical investigation into a hypothesized two-layer central pattern generator (CPG) that controls mammalian walking and how different parameter choices might affect the stepping of a simulated neuromechanical model. Particular attention is paid to the functional role of features that have not received a great deal of attention in previous work: the weak cross-excitatory connectivity within the rhythm generator and the synapse strength between the two layers. Sensitivity evaluations of deafferented CPG models and the combined neuromechanical model are performed. Locomotion frequency is increased in two different ways for both models to investigate whether the model's stability can be predicted by trends in the CPG's phase response curves (PRCs). Our results show that the weak cross-excitatory connection can make the CPG more sensitive to perturbations and that increasing the synaptic strength between the two layers results in a trade-off between forced phase locking and the amount of phase delay that can exist between the two layers. Additionally, although the models exhibit these differences in behavior when disconnected from the biomechanical model, these differences seem to disappear with the full neuromechanical model and result in similar behavior despite a variety of parameter combinations. This indicates that the neural variables do not have to be fixed precisely for stable walking; the biomechanical entrainment and sensory feedback may cancel out the strengths of excitatory connectivity in the neural circuit and play a critical role in shaping locomotor behavior. Our results support the importance of including biomechanical models in the development of computational neuroscience models that control mammalian locomotion.

Indexed as

pattern formationperturbation analysisratrhythm generatorsynthetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID36546926
PMCPMC9776051
OpenAlexW4311527722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.