Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546842›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

Zero-Degree Celsius Capillary Electrophoresis Electrospray Ionization for Hydrogen Exchange Mass Spectrometry.

Jordan T Aerts, Per E Andrén, Erik T Jansson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan T AertsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala751 24, Sweden.
Per E AndrénDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala751 24, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-7743
Erik T JanssonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala751 24, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0675-3412
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, fast liquid chromatographic separations at low temperatures are exclusively used for the separation of peptides generated in hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX) workflows. However, it has been suggested that capillary electrophoresis may be a better option for use with HDX. We performed in solution HDX on peptides and bovine hemoglobin (Hb) followed by quenching, pepsin digestion, and cold capillary electrophoretic separation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) detection for benchmarking a laboratory-built HDX-MS platform. We found that capillaries with a neutral coating to eliminate electroosmotic flow and adsorptive processes provided fast separations with upper limit peak capacities surpassing 170. In contrast, uncoated capillaries achieved 30% higher deuterium retention for an angiotensin II peptide standard owing to faster separations but with only half the peak capacity of coated capillaries. Data obtained using two different separation conditions on peptic digests of Hb showed strong agreement of the relative deuterium uptake between methods. Processed data for denatured versus native Hb after deuterium labeling for the longest timepoint in this study (50,000 s) also showed agreement with subunit interaction sites determined by crystallographic methods. All proteomic data are available under DOI: 10.6019/PXD034245.

Indexed as

HydrogenSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationDeuteriumDeuterium Exchange MeasurementElectrophoresis, CapillaryHemoglobinsPeptidesProteomicsDeuteriumHemoglobinsHydrogenPeptides

Identifiers

PMID36546842
PMCPMC9850406
OpenAlexW4312094483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.