Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546695›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

Whole-genome Analysis Reveals Contrasting Relationships Among Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes Between Three Sympatric Bat Species.

Veronika N Laine, Tiina Sävilammi, Niklas Wahlberg, Katarina Meramo, Gonzalo Ossa, Joseph S Johnson, Anna S Blomberg, Aidyn B Yeszhanov, Veronica Yung, Steve Paterson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Veronika N LaineBatLab Finland, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4516-7002
Tiina SävilammiDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Niklas WahlbergDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Katarina MeramoBatLab Finland, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Gonzalo OssaConserBat EIRL, San Fabian, Chile.
Joseph S JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2555-8142
Anna S BlombergDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Aidyn B YeszhanovInstitute of Zoology of the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Veronica YungDepartamento Laboratorio Biomédico, Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Steve PatersonEvolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Thomas M LilleyBatLab Finland, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5864-4958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding mechanisms involved in speciation can be challenging, especially when hybridization or introgression blurs species boundaries. In bats, resolving relationships of some closely related groups has proved difficult due subtle interspecific variation both in morphometrics and molecular data sets. The endemic South American Histiotus bats, currently considered a subgenus of Eptesicus, harbor unresolved phylogenetic relationships and of those is a trio consisting of two closely related species: Eptesicus (Histiotus) macrotus and Eptesicus (Histiotus) montanus, and their relationship with a third, Eptesicus (Histiotus) magellanicus. The three sympatric species bear marked resemblance to each other, but can be differentiated morphologically. Furthermore, previous studies have been unable to differentiate the species from each other at a molecular level. In order to disentangle the phylogenetic relationships of these species, we examined the differentiation patterns and evolutionary history of the three Eptesicus (H.) species at the whole-genome level. The nuclear DNA statistics between the species suggest strong gene flow and recent hybridization between E. (H.) montanus and E. (H.) macrotus, whereas E. (H.) magellanicus shows a higher degree of isolation. In contrast, mitochondrial DNA shows a closer relationship between E. (H.) magellanicus and E. (H.) montanus. Opposing patterns in mtDNA and nuclear markers are often due to differences in dispersal, and here it could be both as a result of isolation in refugia during the last glacial maximum and female philopatry and male-biased dispersal. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of both the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in resolving phylogenetic relationships and species histories.

Indexed as

ChiropteraGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleMalePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASympatryDNA, Mitochondrialbatsgene flowmitochondrial DNAnuclear DNAphylogenyspeciation

Identifiers

PMID36546695
PMCPMC9825270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.