Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36546681›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2023

The competition-compensation account of developmental language disorder.

Zara Harmon, Libby Barak, Patrick Shafto, Jan Edwards, Naomi H Feldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zara HarmonUniversity of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies (UMIACS), College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-9380
Libby BarakDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Patrick ShaftoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jan EdwardsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Naomi H FeldmanUniversity of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies (UMIACS), College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Optimizing input for language interventionsR21DC017217 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FELDMAN, NAOMI, SHAFTO, PATRICK T · 2018 to 2019
$435k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) regularly use the bare form of verbs (e.g., dance) instead of inflected forms (e.g., danced). We propose an account of this behavior in which processing difficulties of children with DLD disproportionally affect processing novel inflected verbs in their input. Limited experience with inflection in novel contexts leads the inflection to face stronger competition from alternatives. Competition is resolved through a compensatory behavior that involves producing a more accessible alternative: in English, the bare form. We formalize this hypothesis within a probabilistic model that trades off context-dependent versus independent processing. Results show an over-reliance on preceding stem contexts when retrieving the inflection in a model that has difficulty with processing novel inflected forms. We further show that following the introduction of a bias to store and retrieve forms with preceding contexts, generalization in the typically developing (TD) models remains more or less stable, while the same bias in the DLD models exaggerates difficulties with generalization. Together, the results suggest that inconsistent use of inflectional morphemes by children with DLD could stem from inferences they make on the basis of data containing fewer novel inflected forms. Our account extends these findings to suggest that problems with detecting a form in novel contexts combined with a bias to rely on familiar contexts when retrieving a form could explain sequential planning difficulties in children with DLD. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Generalization difficulties with inflectional morphemes in children with Developmental Language Disorder arise from these children's limited experience with novel inflected forms. Limited experience with a form in novel contexts could lead to a storage bias where retrieving a form often requires relying on familiar preceding stems. While generalization in typically developing models remains stable across a range of model parameters, certain parameter values in the impaired models exaggerate difficulties with generalization. Children with DLD compensate for these retrieval difficulties through accessibility-driven language production: they produce the most accessible form among the alternatives.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersChildHumansLanguageLanguage Testschild language disorderfragment grammarshapax legomenanonparametric Bayesian modelsSLI

Identifiers

PMID36546681
PMCPMC13012570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.