ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Comparing the test-retest reliability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging metrics across single band and multiband acquisitions in the context of healthy aging.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Low Frequency Amplitude Differences in Resting-State Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal in the Cerebellum.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Resting-State Functional MRI Analyses for Brain Activity Characterization: A Narrative Review of Features and Methods.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
- The Impact of Multiband and In-Plane Acceleration on White Matter Microstructure Analysis.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Genetic and environmental contributions to ReHo and fALFF in early adolescence vary across brain regions.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Atypical attentional network dynamics in adolescent depression during emotional movie viewing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Opportunities for use of neuroimaging in de-risking drug development and improving clinical outcomes in psychiatry: an industry perspective.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- How do tasks impact the reliability of fMRI functional connectivity?Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Distinct parallel activation and interaction between dorsal and ventral pathways during phonological and semantic processing: A cTBS-fMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Comparing the test-retest reliability of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging metrics across single band and multiband acquisitions in the context of healthy aging.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Test-retest reliability of time-varying patterns of brain activity across single band and multiband resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy older adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- High Multiband Acceleration Degrades Resting-State Functional MRI Reliability and Signal Quality Under Anesthesia.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of meaningful functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) biomarkers requires measures that reliably capture brain performance across different subjects and over multiple scanning sessions. Recent developments in fMRI acquisition, such as the introduction of multiband (MB) protocols and in-plane acceleration, allow for increased scanning speed and improved temporal resolution. However, they may also lead to reduced temporal signal to noise ratio and increased signal leakage between simultaneously excited slices. These methods have been adopted in several scanning modalities including diffusion weighted imaging and fMRI. To our knowledge, no study has formally compared the reliability of the same resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) metrics (amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; seed-to-voxel and region of interest [ROI]-to-ROI connectivity) across conventional single-band fMRI and different MB acquisitions, with and without in-plane acceleration, across three sessions. In this study, 24 healthy older adults were scanned over three visits, on weeks 0, 1, and 4, and, on each occasion, underwent a conventional single band rs-fMRI scan and three different rs-fMRI scans with MB factors 4 and 6, with and without in-plane acceleration. Across all three rs-fMRI metrics, the reliability scores were highest with MB factor 4 with no in-plane acceleration for cortical areas and with conventional single band for subcortical areas. Recommendations for future research studies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.