Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545892›Full record

ArticleEcology2023

Phylogenetic and functional constraints of plant facilitation rewiring.

Ricardo Sánchez-Martín, Miguel Verdú, Alicia Montesinos-Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Key concepts and a world-wide look at plant recruitment networks.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo Sánchez-MartínCentro de Investigaciones Sobre Desertificación (CIDE, CSIC-UV-GV), Moncada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-3276
Miguel VerdúCentro de Investigaciones Sobre Desertificación (CIDE, CSIC-UV-GV), Moncada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9778-7692
Alicia Montesinos-NavarroCentro de Investigaciones Sobre Desertificación (CIDE, CSIC-UV-GV), Moncada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-0321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facilitative interactions bind community species in intricate ecological networks, preserving species that would otherwise be lost. The traditional understanding of ecological networks as static components of biological communities overlooks the fact that species interactions in a network can fluctuate. Analyzing the patterns that cause those shifts can reveal the principles that govern the identity of pairwise interactions and whether they are predictable based on the traits of the interacting species and the local environmental contexts in which they occur. Here we explore how abiotic stress and phylogenetic and functional affinities constrain those shifts. Specifically, we hypothesize that rewiring the facilitative interactions is more limited in stressful than in mild environments. We present evidence of a distinct pattern in the rewiring of facilitation-driven communities at different stress levels. In highly stressful environments with a firm reliance on facilitation, rewiring is limited to growing beneath nurse species with traits to overcome harsh stressful conditions. However, when environments are milder, rewiring is more flexible, although it is still constrained to nurses that are close relatives. Understanding the ability of species to rewire their interactions is crucial for predicting how communities may respond to the unprecedented rate of perturbations on Earth.

Indexed as

BiotaPlantsHumansPhenotypePhylogenyfacilitationfunctional constraintsgypsum affinitynetworksphylogenetic constraintsrewiringspecies turnovertraits

Identifiers

PMID36545892
PMCPMC10078402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.