Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545648›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care

Accessibility to Telerehabilitation Services for People With Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Barriers and Limitations.

Arpita Gopal, Valeria Bonanno, Valerie J Block, Riley M Bove

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arpita GopalDepartment of Neurology, MS and Neuroinflammation Clinic, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (AG, VJB, RMB), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-3584
Valeria BonannoThe Multiple Sclerosis Center Sant'Andrea Hospital, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy (VB).
Valerie J BlockDepartment of Neurology, MS and Neuroinflammation Clinic, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (AG, VJB, RMB), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Riley M BoveDepartment of Neurology, MS and Neuroinflammation Clinic, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (AG, VJB, RMB), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · IT

Funding

The Role of B cells in the Origin and Progression of Multiple SclerosisR35NS111644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEPHEN L HAUSER · 2019 to 2026
$9.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS111644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn multiple sclerosis (MS), telemedicine improves access to specialized medical care; however, barriers remain, including universal access and effective implementation. Focusing on telerehabilitation, ie, remotely delivered physical therapy, our goal was to identify barriers to telerehabilitation implementation and factors associated with patients completing telerehabilitation physical therapy treatment.

methodsQuantitative data included a review of electronic health records of patients with MS treated at the University of California San Francisco Physical Therapy Faculty Practice. We extracted demographic, clinical, and transit-related factors. For patients who scheduled an initial evaluation, we recorded the number of follow-ups, cancellations, completed physical therapy goals, and discharges. Qualitative data included interviews with 3 board-certified neurologic physical therapists and patients' perspectives recorded in the subjective portion of physical therapy notes.

resultsWe identified 111 patients with at least 1 visit (in-person or telerehabilitation) to physical therapy (82 women; mean ± SD age, 54.2 ± 12.7 years). Patients with no disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, 0) were 73% less likely to schedule a follow-up appointment (in-person or telerehabilitation) than those with some disability (EDSS score, >0) (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.75;

conclusionsPatients with no disability were least likely to complete physical therapy treatment via telerehabilitation. Although both benefits and barriers to completing physical therapy via telerehabilitation are present, the neurologic physical therapists were supportive of a hybrid model for physical therapy.

Indexed as

telehealthtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36545648
PMCPMC9749830
OpenAlexW4294761563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.