ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2022
Service Delivery Models for the Management of Pediatric and Adolescent Concussion: A Systematic Review.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Time to Evaluation After Pediatric Concussion: Factors Affecting Specialty Concussion Care.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the current peer-reviewed literature on pediatric concussion and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) service delivery models (SDMs) and relevant cost analyses. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), APA PsycINFO (EBSCO), and Web of Science Core Collection, limited to human trials published in English from January 1, 2001, to January 10, 2022. Study Selection: Included articles that (1) were peer-reviewed; (2) were evidence-based; (3) described service delivery and/or associated health care costs; and (4) focused on mTBI, concussion, or postconcussion symptoms of children and adolescents. Studies describing emergency department-based interventions, adults, and moderate to severe brain injuries were excluded. Data Extraction: The initial search resulted in 1668 articles. Using Rayyan software, 2 reviewers independently completed title and abstract screening followed by a full-text screening of potentially included articles. A third blinded reviewer resolved inclusion/exclusion conflicts among the other reviewers. This resulted in 28 articles included. Data Synthesis: Each of the 28 articles were grouped into 1 of the following 3 categories: generalist-based services (7), specialist-based services (12), and web/telemedicine services (6). One article discussed both generalists and specialists. It was clear that specialists are more proactive in their treatment of concussion than generalists. Most of the research on generalists emphasized the need for education and training. Four studies discussed costs relevant to SDMs. Conclusions: This review highlights the need for more discussion and formalized evaluation of SDMs to better understand concussion management. Overall there is more literature on specialist-based services than generalist-based services. Specialists and generalists have overarching similarities but differ often in their approach to pediatric concussion management. Cost analysis data are sparse and more research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.