Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545494›Full record

Trial reportVascular health and risk management2022

Effect of Sequential Nephron Blockade versus Dual Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Plus Bisoprolol in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension, a Randomized Controlled Trial (Resistant Hypertension on Treatment - ResHypOT).

Elizabeth do Espirito Santo Cestario, Jose Fernando Vilela-Martin, Luciana Neves Cosenso-Martin, Tatiane Azevedo Rubio, Jessica Rodrigues Roma Uyemura, Valquiria da Silva Lopes, Letícia Aparecida Barufi Fernandes, Lucia Helena Bonalume Tacito, Heitor Moreno Junior, Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vascular health and risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth do Espirito Santo Cestario *Hypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8621-0305
Jose Fernando Vilela-Martin *Hypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6960-2825
Luciana Neves Cosenso-MartinHypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-1082
Tatiane Azevedo RubioHypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8878-2606
Jessica Rodrigues Roma UyemuraHypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-2862
Valquiria da Silva LopesHypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-5798
Letícia Aparecida Barufi FernandesHypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-6326
Lucia Helena Bonalume TacitoEndocrinology Division, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1823-5900
Heitor Moreno JuniorCardiovascular Pharmacology Laboratory, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6330-697X
Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo *Hypertension Clinic, Internal Medicine Department, Medical School in São José Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-6536
Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a leading public health concern. Objectives: The primary aim was to compare sequential nephron blockade (SNB) versus dual renin-angiotensin system blockade (DRASB) plus bisoprolol in patients with resistant hypertension to observe reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) levels after 20 weeks of treatment. Material and Methods: This trial was an open-label, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, clinical study with optional drug up-titration. Participants were evaluated during five visits at 28-day intervals. Results: The mean age was 55.5 years in the SNB and 58.4 years in the DRASB + bisoprolol group (p=NS). Significant office BP reductions were observed in both groups. SNB group, SBP decreased from 174.5±21.0 to 127.0±14.74 mmHg (p<0.0001), and DBP decreased from 105.3±15.5 to 78.11±9.28 mmHg (p<0.0001). DRASB group, SBP decreased from 178.4±21.08 to 134.4 ± 23.25 mmHg (p<0.0001) and DBP decreased from 102.7±11.07 to 77.33±13.75 mmHg (p<0.0001). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) showed also significant SBP and DBP reductions in both groups (p<0.0001). Conclusion: In patients with RHTN adherent to treatment, SNB and DRASB plus bisoprolol showed excellent therapeutic efficacy, although SNB was associated with earlier SBP reduction.

Indexed as

BisoprololHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansMiddle AgedNephronsProspective StudiesRenin-Angiotensin SystemAntihypertensive AgentsBisoprololbisoprololdual blockade of the renin-angiotensin systemnatriuretic agentsresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID36545494
PMCPMC9762262
OpenAlexW4311472427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.