Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545490›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2022

Improving HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis persistence among adolescent girls and young women: Insights from a mixed-methods evaluation of community, hybrid, and facility service delivery models in Namibia.

Gena Barnabee, Gillian O'Bryan, Lylie Ndeikemona, Idel Billah, Lukas Silas, Karie L Morgan, Katherine Shulock, Susan Mawire, Ellen MacLachlan, Josua Nghipangelwa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gena BarnabeeInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Gillian O'BryanInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Lylie NdeikemonaDirectorate of Special Programmes, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Idel BillahInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Windhoek, Namibia.
Lukas SilasInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Windhoek, Namibia.
Karie L MorganCenter for Data Management and Translational Research, Michigan Public Health Institute, Okemos, MI, United States.
Katherine ShulockDisease Control and Health Statistics (DCHS), Washington State Department of Health, Seattle, WA, United States.
Susan MawireStar for Life, Windhoek, Namibia.
Ellen MacLachlanInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Josua NghipangelwaOshikoto Regional Directorate, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Omuthiya, Namibia.
Elizabeth MuremiKhomas Regional Directorate, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Windhoek, Namibia.
Alison EnsmingerInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Norbert ForsterInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Windhoek, Namibia.
Gabrielle O'MalleyInternational Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · USMinistry of Health and Social Services · NAMichigan Public Health Institute · USWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

University of Washington Developmental AIDS Research Center for Mental Health (UW ARCH)P30MH123248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMONI, JANE M. · 2021 to 2024
$5.8M
CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001430NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH123248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the potential for community-based approaches to increase access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), there is limited evidence of whether and how they improve PrEP persistence. We compared PrEP persistence among AGYW receiving services through community and hybrid models in Namibia to facility-based services. We subsequently identify potential mechanisms to explain how and why community and hybrid models achieved (or not) improved persistence to inform further service delivery innovation. Methods: Data were collected from PrEP service delivery to AGYW over two-years in Namibia's Khomas Region. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate survival curves for PrEP persistence beyond three-months after initiation and report the cumulative probability of persistence at one- and three-months. Persistence was defined as any PrEP use within three months after initiation followed by a PrEP refill or previously prescribed supply of at least 30 days at the three-month visit. Interviews were conducted with 28 AGYW and 19 providers and analyzed using a deductive-inductive thematic approach. Results: From October 2017 through September 2019, 372 (18.7%) AGYW received services through a facility model, 302 (15.1%) through a community model, and 1,320 (66.2%) through a hybrid model. PrEP persistence at one- and three-months was 41.2% and 34.9% in the community model and 6.2% and 4.8% in the hybrid model compared to 36.8% and 26.7% in the facility model. Within the community and hybrid models, we identified three potential mechanisms related to PrEP persistence. Individualized service delivery offered Conclusion: Service delivery approaches that offer convenience and simplicity and foster social connectedness may reduce access barriers and increase social support enabling AGYW to self-manage their PrEP use and achieve improved PrEP persistence.

Indexed as

adolescent girls and young womendelivery of health careHIV preventionNamibiapre-exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36545490
PMCPMC9760915
OpenAlexW4310675879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.