ArticleJournal of patient experience2022
Patient Experiences With Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the Efficacy of a Telehealth-Based Virtual Reality Clinic in Treating Adults With Specific Phobia: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- From Couch to Click: Opportunities and Challenges of Hybrid Work Models in Mental Health Care.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Examining a Telemedicine-Based Virtual Reality Clinic in Treating Adults With Specific Phobia: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Care Delivery in Community Health Centers Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic (2019-2022).Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2024Article
- Mental health providers are inexperienced but interested in telehealth-based virtual reality therapy: survey study.Frontiers in virtual reality · 2024Article
- Mental Health Client Experiences of Telehealth in Aotearoa New Zealand During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons and Implications.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemental health (TMH) was an effective and relatively well-accepted way of delivering mental health care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and has become widely adopted through the pandemic. Although recent findings show telehealth remains relatively well accepted across health care broadly, little is known about how patient experiences of TMH may have changed through the pandemic as many sectors were virtualized. These findings describe patient experiences with TMH at an outpatient mental health clinic approximately 1 year after the clinic rapidly transitioned to full TMH due to COVID-19. Respondents are 137 adult patients. Most patients reported TMH to be extremely or very effective (85.0%) and better than anticipated (76.8%). Most patients (74.6%) were interested in continuing at least some visits by TMH after the pandemic. A small subset of patients who rated their relationship with their provider as better in-person than by TMH also reported a preference for most or all visits in-person. Results provide preliminary support that TMH remains a well-accepted option for many patients. Mental health clinics may best serve patients by offering a hybrid model of care that includes both TMH and in-person services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.