Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545471›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Advances in

Dan Liu, Wei Tang, Chao Han, Shaoping Nie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparison ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Protective Effects ofToxics · 2025
    Article
  13. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigating the renoprotective effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparison ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dan LiuKey Laboratory of Pollution Exposure and Health Intervention of Zhejiang Province, College of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China.
Wei TangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Chao HanKey Laboratory of Pollution Exposure and Health Intervention of Zhejiang Province, College of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China.
Shaoping NieState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, China-Canada Joint Lab of Food Science and Technology (Nanchang), Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhejiang Shuren University · CNNanchang University · CNZhejiang University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bioactivitybiosynthesisextractionPolygonatum sibiricum polysaccharidepurificationstructure

Identifiers

PMID36545471
PMCPMC9760828
OpenAlexW4311515032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.