Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545364›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Can diet niche partitioning enhance sexual dimorphism?

Joshua T Bauld, Katharine A Abernethy, Jason Newton, David Lehmann, Isabel L Jones, Luc F Bussière

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-Based Dietary Divergence in Plateau Pikas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sharks Violate Rensch's Rule for Sexual Size Dimorphism.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua T BauldBiological and Environmental Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-2322
Katharine A AbernethyBiological and Environmental Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-9342
Jason NewtonNational Environmental Isotope Facility Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre East Kilbride UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-3693
David LehmannAgence Nationale des Parcs Nationaux (ANPN) Libreville Gabon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-5104
Isabel L JonesBiological and Environmental Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8361-1370
Luc F BussièreBiology and Environmental Sciences and Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8937-8381

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T019018/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic evolutionary theory suggests that sexual dimorphism evolves primarily via sexual and fecundity selection. However, theory and evidence are beginning to accumulate suggesting that resource competition can drive the evolution of sexual dimorphism, via ecological character displacement between sexes. A key prediction of this hypothesis is that the extent of ecological divergence between sexes will be associated with the extent of sexual dimorphism. As the stable isotope ratios of animal tissues provide a quantitative measure of various aspects of ecology, we carried out a meta-analysis examining associations between the extent of isotopic divergence between sexes and the extent of body size dimorphism. Our models demonstrate that large amounts of between-study variation in isotopic (ecological) divergence between sexes is nonrandom and may be associated with the traits of study subjects. We, therefore, completed meta-regressions to examine whether the extent of isotopic divergence between sexes is associated with the extent of sexual size dimorphism. We found modest but significantly positive associations across species between size dimorphism and ecological differences between sexes, that increased in strength when the ecological opportunity for dietary divergence between sexes was greatest. Our results, therefore, provide further evidence that ecologically mediated selection, not directly related to reproduction, can contribute to the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Indexed as

disruptive selectionecological character displacementevolutionresource competitionsexual dimorphismsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID36545364
PMCPMC9760898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.