Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545260›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2023

Detecting Glaucoma from Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning without Convolutions: Transformer for Improved Generalization.

Rui Fan, Kamran Alipour, Christopher Bowd, Mark Christopher, Nicole Brye, James A Proudfoot, Michael H Goldbaum, Akram Belghith, Christopher A Girkin, Massimo A Fazio and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mask of Truth: Model Sensitivity to Unexpected Regions of Medical Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Robust Uncertainty-Informed Glaucoma Classification Under Data Shift.Translational vision science & technology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui FanHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kamran AlipourDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Christopher BowdHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Mark ChristopherHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Nicole BryeHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
James A ProudfootHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Michael H GoldbaumHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Akram BelghithHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Christopher A GirkinDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Massimo A FazioHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jeffrey M LiebmannBernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Michael PazzaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
David KriegmanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology and Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
The California Eye Institute · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USTongji University · CN

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Derek Stuart Welsbie · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Multimodal Artificial Intelligence to Predict Glaucomatous Progression and Surgical InterventionR01EY034146 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAXTER, SALLY LIU, CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2022 to 2025
$1.8M
Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Glaucoma and Predict Progression from Spectral Domain Optical Coherence TomographyR00EY030942 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTOPHER, MARK · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R00 EY030942NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and explainability of a Vision Transformer deep learning technique, Data-efficient image Transformer (DeiT), and ResNet-50, trained on fundus photographs from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) to detect primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and identify the salient areas of the photographs most important for each model's decision-making process. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Subjects Participants and Controls: Overall 66 715 photographs from 1636 OHTS participants and an additional 5 external datasets of 16 137 photographs of healthy and glaucoma eyes. Methods: Data-efficient image Transformer models were trained to detect 5 ground-truth OHTS POAG classifications: OHTS end point committee POAG determinations because of disc changes (model 1), visual field (VF) changes (model 2), or either disc or VF changes (model 3) and Reading Center determinations based on disc (model 4) and VFs (model 5). The best-performing DeiT models were compared with ResNet-50 models on OHTS and 5 external datasets. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and sensitivities at fixed specificities. The explainability of the DeiT and ResNet-50 models was compared by evaluating the attention maps derived directly from DeiT to 3 gradient-weighted class activation map strategies. Results: Compared with our best-performing ResNet-50 models, the DeiT models demonstrated similar performance on the OHTS test sets for all 5 ground-truth POAG labels; AUROC ranged from 0.82 (model 5) to 0.91 (model 1). Data-efficient image Transformer AUROC was consistently higher than ResNet-50 on the 5 external datasets. For example, AUROC for the main OHTS end point (model 3) was between 0.08 and 0.20 higher in the DeiT than ResNet-50 models. The saliency maps from the DeiT highlight localized areas of the neuroretinal rim, suggesting important rim features for classification. The same maps in the ResNet-50 models show a more diffuse, generalized distribution around the optic disc. Conclusions: Vision Transformers have the potential to improve generalizability and explainability in deep learning models, detecting eye disease and possibly other medical conditions that rely on imaging for clinical diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

AI, artificial intelligenceAUROC, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curveCI, confidence intervalCNN, convolutional neural networkDeep learningDeiT, Data-efficient image TransformerDL, deep learningFundus photographsGlaucoma detectionLAG, Large-Scale Attention-Based GlaucomaOHTS, Ocular Hypertension Treatment StudyPOAG, primary open-angle glaucomaSoTA, state-of-the-artVF, visual fieldVision TransformersViT, Vision Transformer

Identifiers

PMID36545260
PMCPMC9762193
OpenAlexW4306771247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.