Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545258›Full record

ArticleDiabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2022

Marked Improvement in A1C Levels After Initiation of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Maintained Over 4 Years in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Jyrki Mustonen, Päivi Rautiainen, Marja-Leena Lamidi, Piia Lavikainen, Janne Martikainen, Tiina Laatikainen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jyrki MustonenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun Sote), Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-5983
Päivi RautiainenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun Sote), Joensuu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2033-6893
Marja-Leena LamidiInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4273-4005
Piia LavikainenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Janne MartikainenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tiina LaatikainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of long-term use of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Design and methods: In this retrospective real-world study, 689 patients with type 1 diabetes who were >18 years of age and using isCGM were identified from the electronic patient records in North Karelia, Finland. A1C data were collected before and after the initiation of isCGM. The primary outcome was a change in the mean A1C over time after isCGM started. Results: The greatest reductions in the mean A1C levels were observed 6 months (-0.54% [-5.9 mmol/mol], Conclusion: Use of isCGM improves A1C levels significantly in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Significant reduction in A1C persisted over 4 years of use, although the effect diminished over time.

Identifiers

PMID36545258
PMCPMC9668726
OpenAlexW4312114213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.