Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545250›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2022

Impacting Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Through Primary Care Practice Audits: A Quality Improvement Study.

Alexander I Mosa, Don Watts, Navdeep Tangri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander I MosaMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6610-1371
Don WattsKhure Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Navdeep TangriDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-6370
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk prediction tools are important in chronic disease management, but their implementation into clinical workflow is often limited by lack of electronic health record (EHR)-linked solutions. Objective: To implement the Khure Health (KH) clinical decision support platform with an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled algorithm for chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk detection in 201 primary care provider practices across Ontario. Design: Multi-practice quality improvement study. Setting: The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Participants: 201 primary care practices. Measurements: Per-practice CKD risk stratification and clinician action. Methods: Data for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, demographics, and comorbid conditions were extracted from the EHR using KH's natural language processing (NLP) algorithms. Patients already on dialysis, visiting a nephrologist, older than 85, or already on a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) were excluded. The remaining individuals were risk stratified using the kidney failure risk equation, presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), or other comorbid conditions. A dashboard with disease-specific educational information and links to the EHRs of the identified patients was created. Results: We screened 361 299 individuals and identified 8194 patients with CKD Stage 3 at risk for progression or cardiovascular events. A total of 620 individuals were at high risk for CKD progression or CVD, and 2592 were at intermediate risk. A total of 2010 individuals (10 patients per practice) at high or moderate risk were selected for a chart audit, and appropriate additional testing (repeat eGFR or albuminuria) or prescription of disease-modifying therapy occurred in 24.32% of these patients. Limitations: Data on comorbidities, medications, or demographic variables are not available for presentation or statistical analysis due to privacy legislation and primary care provider (PCP) custodianship over EHR data. Conclusion: An AI-enabled EHR clinical decision support application that can detect and risk stratify patients with CKD can enable improved laboratory testing and management. Larger trials of clinical decision support and practice audit applications will be needed to impact CKD management nationally.

Indexed as

clinical decision support softwareEHRkidney failure risk equationquality improvementrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID36545250
PMCPMC9761206
OpenAlexW4312112840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.