Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545230›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Aiming at harmony. Comparing and contrasting International HFrEF Guidelines.

Daniela Tomasoni, Marianna Adamo, Biykem Bozkurt, Paul Heidenreich, Theresa McDonagh, Giuseppe M C Rosano, Sean A Virani, Shelley Zieroth, Marco Metra

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela TomasoniCardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-2857
Marianna AdamoCardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Biykem BozkurtWinters Center for Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul HeidenreichUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Theresa McDonaghSchool of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, UK.
Giuseppe M C RosanoCentre for Clinical and Basic Research, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, via della Pisana, 235, 00163 Rome, Italy.
Sean A ViraniDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Shelley ZierothDepartment of Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Marco MetraCardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-8568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have led to major changes in the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and these advances are included in the recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) guidelines issued in 2021 and 2022, respectively. According to both guidelines, treatment of patients with HFrEF is based on the administration of four classes of drugs that reduce the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations in RCTs: angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Specific sequences of treatment are not recommended but emphasis is given to reaching treatment with all four drugs as early as possible. Further treatments are considered in selected patients including ivabradine, hydralazine nitrates, digoxin, and the new agent vericiguat. Specific treatments, mostly new, for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities are also given. The aim of this article is to compare the two recent guidelines issued by the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA and show the few differences and the many consistent recommendations, now more numerous given the evidence available for many new treatments.

Indexed as

ACC/AHA/HFSAComparisonESCGuidelinesHeart failureHFrEF

Identifiers

PMID36545230
PMCPMC9762876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.