ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022
Advances, applications, and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for routinely encountered foodborne pathogens.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Sustainable Nanotechnology Approaches for Rapid Food Contaminant Detection and Future Food Safety Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stable and High-Throughput Single-Cell Sorting of Food Bacteria Using Spatiotemporal Video-Enhanced Raman Tweezers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From conventional to biosensor-based detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026Review
- Biosensing technologies for foodborne pathogen detection and healthcare: principles, emerging materials, and intelligent platforms.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Optimizing Lysis and Extraction Workflows for Enrichment-Free qPCR Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Polystyrene Microsphere-Labeled Lateral Flow Assay for the Visual Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Multimodal AI for Real-Time Food Safety and Quality: From Sensors to Foundation Models, Edge Deployment, and Regulation.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Safe Meat, Smart Science: Biotechnology's Role in Antibiotic Residue Removal.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A manually driven centrifugal microfluidic LAMP platform for rapid visual detection of waterborne pathogens in aquatic sports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hydrophobin-Fused SARS-CoV-2 RBD production inFuture science OA · 2025Article
- The Development of Foodborne Pathogen Detection and Biosensor Design for Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Biosensors for Enhanced Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Advancements in Microbial Applications for Sustainable Food Production.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plasmonic sensing in microfluidic paper-based analytical devices integrated with metal nanoparticles: a review.RSC advances · 2025Review
- AI-Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing Systems: A Paradigm Shift for Intelligent Food Safety Monitoring.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Nanoparticle-based detection of foodborne pathogens: Addressing matrix challenges, advances, and future perspectives in food safety.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Detecting Four Major Foodborne Pathogens in Meat and Meat Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multiplexed Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bacteriophage-based biosensors technology: Materials, fabrications, efficiencies and shortcomings.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional foodborne pathogen detection methods are highly dependent on pre-treatment of samples and selective microbiological plating to reliably screen target microorganisms. Inherent limitations of conventional methods include longer turnaround time and high costs, use of bulky equipment, and the need for trained staff in centralized laboratory settings. Researchers have developed stable, reliable, sensitive, and selective, rapid foodborne pathogens detection assays to work around these limitations. Recent advances in rapid diagnostic technologies have shifted to on-site testing, which offers flexibility and ease-of-use, a significant improvement from traditional methods' rigid and cumbersome steps. This comprehensive review aims to thoroughly discuss the recent advances, applications, and limitations of portable and rapid biosensors for routinely encountered foodborne pathogens. It discusses the major differences between biosensing systems based on the molecular interactions of target analytes and biorecognition agents. Though detection limits and costs still need further improvement, reviewed technologies have high potential to assist the food industry in the on-site detection of biological hazards such as foodborne pathogens and toxins to maintain safe and healthy foods. Finally, this review offers targeted recommendations for future development and commercialization of diagnostic technologies specifically for emerging and re-emerging foodborne pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.