Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545183›Full record

ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2022

Office-Based Procedures in the Management of Hemorrhoidal Disease: Rubber Band Ligation versus Sclerotherapy - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Paulo Salgueiro, Maria Inês Ramos, Fernando Castro-Poças, Diogo Libânio

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05807425 (Sclerotherapy With Polidocanol Foam in the Treatment of First, Second and Third-Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05807425 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sclerotherapy With Polidocanol Foam in the Treatment of First, Second and Third-Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Prospective, Cohort Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade do PortoRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsHemorrhoids, Liver CirrhosisArmsPolidocanol foam sclerotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Radiofrequency Ablation for Hemorrhoidal Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  12. Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paulo SalgueiroGastroenterology Department of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Inês RamosInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Fernando Castro-PoçasGastroenterology Department of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Diogo LibânioGastroenterology Department of Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The most frequently used office-based procedures in hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are rubber band ligation (RBL) and sclerotherapy. Few studies have been published comparing the various types of instrumental therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy and RBL. Methods: Three online databases were searched. Efficacy (control of symptoms, prolapse, bleeding and pain, patients' satisfaction, and disease recurrence) and safety (complications, such as pain and bleeding) were the assessed outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) were computed for each outcome using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and Results: Six RCTs and three cohort studies were included. Control of prolapse and bleeding was significantly higher with RBL (93.1% RBL vs. 66.4% sclerotherapy, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.60 and 89.1% RBL vs. 78.7% SCL, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34, respectively). Both techniques had similar results in terms of pain relief, overall control of symptoms, and risk of recurrence at 3 months. Although patient satisfaction was significantly higher with RBL (77.8% RBL vs. 46.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.50), post-procedural pain was significantly higher with this technique (24% RBL vs. 14% sclerotherapy, RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.32-2.28). There was no significant difference regarding post-procedure bleeding (11.1% RBL vs. 8.7% sclerotherapy, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.86-1.94). In the subgroup analysis, according to the HD grade, post-procedure pain was higher with RBL only in HD grade II (vs. HD grade I-III). Conclusions: RBL performs better than sclerotherapy in controlling HD symptoms, specifically prolapse and bleeding, although post-procedural pain is a frequent complication. Recurrence is similar with both procedures. While waiting for the publication of results with sclerotherapy with new sclerosants, RBL remains the office-based treatment of choice in HD.

Indexed as

Hemorrhoidal diseaseRubber band ligationSclerotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36545183
PMCPMC9761374
OpenAlexW4220885388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.