Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545135›Full record

ReviewChemical science2022

Anode optimization strategies for aqueous zinc-ion batteries.

Yiyang Zhang, Xiaobo Zheng, Nana Wang, Wei-Hong Lai, Yong Liu, Shu-Lei Chou, Hua-Kun Liu, Shi-Xue Dou, Yun-Xiao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perspectives on zinc-based flow batteries.Fundamental research · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yiyang ZhangInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.
Xiaobo ZhengDepartment of Chemistry, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China.
Nana WangInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.
Wei-Hong LaiInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.
Yong LiuLaboratory of Nanoscale Biosensing and Bioimaging, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry, School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University China yongliu@wmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6932-583X
Shu-Lei ChouInstitute for Carbon Neutralization, College of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Wenzhou University Wenzhou 325035 China chou@wzu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-6082
Hua-Kun LiuInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.
Shi-Xue DouInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-7693
Yun-Xiao WangInstitute for Superconducting & Electronic Materials, Australian Institute of Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong Innovation Campus, Squires Way North Wollongong New South Wales 2500 Australia yunxiao@uow.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-0829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have received much research attention due to their advantages of safety, non-toxicity, simple manufacture, and element abundance. Nevertheless, serious problems still remain for their anodes, such as dendrite development, corrosion, passivation, and the parasitic hydrogen evolution reaction due to their unique aqueous electrolyte system constituting the main issues that must be addressed, which are blocking the further advancement of anodes for Zn-ion batteries. Herein, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the problems that exist for the zinc anode, summarize the main failure types and mechanisms of the zinc anode, and review the main modification strategies for the anode from the three aspects of the electrolyte, anode surface, and anode host. Furthermore, we also shed light on further modification and optimization strategies for the zinc anode, which provide directions for the future development of anodes for zinc-ion batteries.

Identifiers

PMID36545135
PMCPMC9749470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.