Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544977›Full record

ArticleAddiction & health2022

Validation and Psychological Properties of the Persian Version of DSM 5 Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (PYFAS 2.0) in Non-clinical Population.

Mohammad Niroumand Sarvandani, Masoud Asadi, Farideh Khosravi, Ashley N Gearhardt, Mohammadsadegh Razmhosseini, Maryam Soleimani, Fahimeh Mohseni, Behzad Garmabi, Raheleh Rafaiee

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammad Niroumand SarvandaniStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-3908
Masoud AsadiDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5872-7673
Farideh KhosraviStudent Research Committee, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-0451
Ashley N GearhardtDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-5731
Mohammadsadegh RazmhosseiniDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-3012
Maryam SoleimaniDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0809-4112
Fahimeh MohseniCenter for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-7072
Behzad GarmabiStudy and Treatment of Circadian Rhythms Research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-0250
Raheleh RafaieeDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Yale Food Addiction Scale version 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) is used for the assessment of food addiction (FA). This research intended to evaluate the validity of the Persian translation of the questionnaire and to investigate the psychological properties and the association between FA and anthropometric indices. Methods: In a sample of 473 nonclinical participants, FA, binge eating, and objectively measured anthropometric indices were assessed. Internal consistency, convergent, and validity of the PYFAS 2.0 were examined. Also, the factor structure (confirmatory factor analysis following the 11 diagnostic indicators in addition to the significant distress) and the construct of the scale were evaluated. Findings: The frequencies of mild, moderate, and severe FA based on PYFAS 2.0 were 0.2%, 10%, and 5.5%, respectively. The findings supported a one-factor structure. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good construct validity (RMSEA=0.043, χ Conclusion: The PYFAS 2.0 was a psychometrically sound instrument in an Iranian non-clinical population. This questionnaire can be used to study FA in Persian non-clinical populations. Future research should study the psychometric characteristics of this scale in high-risk groups.

Indexed as

Binge eatingFood addictionObesityPsychological propertiesValidation

Identifiers

PMID36544977
PMCPMC9743828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.