ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
Outcomes and learning curve of endoscopic tympanoplasty: A retrospective analysis of 376 patients.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Outcomes and learning curve of endoscopic tympanoplasty: A retrospective analysis of 376 patients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and learning curve of type I endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET) performed by a single surgeon. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 376 patients who underwent type I ET performed by a single surgeon over 7 years. We evaluated the pre/post air-bone gap (ABG), time required for surgery, changes in pain after surgery, success, and failure rate of type I ET. Results: Hearing results indicated an ABG of approximately 17.8 dB before surgery but decreased significantly to 9.8 dB at 6 months after surgery. The time required for the operation gradually decreased. In particular, the time required for the procedure was 67.6 min in the first year and decreased to 31.5 minutes in the fifth year, a drastic reduction. The graft failure rate up to 6 months after surgery was 13.0% and was the same for both primary and revision surgeries. Graft failure was significantly greater with increasing size of the preoperative tympanic perforation. The success rate varied depending on graft material, and the group with only acellular allogenic dermal matrix showed the lowest success rate. Postoperative pain significantly decreased from 2.01 immediately after surgery to 0.78 points the next day, and there were no severe complications during surgery. Conclusions: ET produces superior cosmetic results with minimal pain and is associated with stable hearing improvement and high success rate. The operation time decreased with surgeon experience and continued to decrease until the fifth and final year of this analysis. Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.