ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2022
Preoperative perforator localization in anterolateral thigh free flap using acoustic doppler and computed tomography angiography.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Localizing Perforators of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap: Color Doppler Ultrasonography Vs Indocyanine Green Angiography.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- [Clinical application effects of the "novel three-longitude and five-transverse method" for perforator localization of anterolateral thigh chimeric flaps].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- The Challenges of Postoperative Tissue Flap Vitality Monitoring in Obese Individuals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Preoperative perforator localization in anterolateral thigh free flap using acoustic doppler and computed tomography angiography.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Our aim in this study was to investigate if we could predict perforator localization during ALTF elevation, using information from acoustic Doppler (AD) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods: Prospective observational data were collected from H&N cancer patients who received reconstruction with ALTF in Ajou University Hospital Cancer Center from June to December, 2021. Total of 21 cases were included in the analysis. Lower extremity angio-CT scans were used to determine the course and depth of the perforator before surgery. During intraoperative design of the ALTF, the possible location of the perforator was identified by AD. After flap elevation, the distance between the actual and Doppler-identified location of the perforator was measured. Results: The average distance from the actual location to the Doppler-identified location was 1.29 ± 1.26 cm. Among 21 cases, almost all perforators (20 cases) were identified in a circle with a radius equivalent to the depth of the perforator. Perforator depth measured by CTA showed a significant positive correlation with the distance from the actual to Doppler-identified location, regardless of skin thickness or body mass index (BMI). Conclusions: A circle with a radius equivalent to the CTA-assessed depth of the perforator successfully predicted the location of the perforator in almost all cases. Depth of the perforator measured by CTA combined with Doppler-identified location can help safely locate the perforator during ALTF harvesting.Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.