ArticleHeliyon2022
Using an ultra-compact optical system to improve lateral flow immunoassay results quantitatively.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) is a paper-based platform with extensive application in point-of-care (POC) testing and many fields. However, its clinical application is severely limited due to the lack of quantitative ability of standard LFIA tests; this augmentation provides the system with quantifying the signal from magenta-colored AuNPs. To address this issue, we proposed an ultra-compact optical system that allowed LFIAs to be performed more accurately and objectively. The experimental setup consisted of multiple optical accessories manufactured by 3D printing (STEP files were included). A high-resolution printer was used to print out a magenta card model for the LFIA, whose color code, ranging from 255, 255, 255 to 255, 0, 255 in the RGB (red, green, blue) format, represents different levels of magenta color intensity (from 0% to 100%) and thus the results of LFIA test strips. A mathematical model was built using a calibration curve to describe the relationship between magenta color value and reflectance spectrum. In addition, a spectrum module was integrated into the proposed system to identify and quantify LFIA results. This integration represents a pioneering step in developing portable detection techniques that facilitate quantifying LFIA results. Finally, we expect this ultra-compact optical spectroscopy system to have great potential for novel clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.