Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544688›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Carbon-ion radiotherapy in the treatment of radiation-induced second primary malignancies.

Jing Yang, Jing Gao, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Hu, Xianxin Qiu, Qingting Huang, Lin Kong, Jiade J Lu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of particle therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A perspective on tumor radiation resistance following high-LET radiation treatment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Jing GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiyi HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Weixu HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Xianxin QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Qingting HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Lin KongShanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.
Jiade J LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of radiation-induced second primary malignancy (RI-SPM) is challenging and usually associated with poor outcomes. For patients with unresectable or incompletely resected diseases, carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) offers physical and biologic advantages over photon-based re-irradiation. We report the results of salvage CIRT in 15 patients with RI-SPM. Methods: Fifteen consecutive and non-selected patients with RI-SPM who underwent salvage CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center between November 2015 and May 2019 were included in this retrospective study. CIRT doses were 57.5-69 Gy (RBE) [at 2.5-3.0 Gy (RBE)/daily fraction]. The actuarial 1-year overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates as well as acute/late toxicities were analyzed. Results: Among the 15 patients included, 10 were soft tissue sarcomas, 2 were chondrosarcomas, 1 was osteosarcoma, 1 was squamous cell carcinoma and 1 was esthesioneuroblastoma. With a median follow-up of 13.0 (range, 2.73-29.63) months, the actuarial 1-year OS, LPFS, DMFS, and PFS rates were 69.3%, 53.0%, 92.9%, and 48.2%, respectively. No grade 2 and grade 3 acute adverse effect was observed. One patient experienced grade 4 hemorrhage which required embolization during CIRT, and lately died from hemorrhage (grade 5) at 3.4 months after the completion of CIRT. No other late adverse effects of ≥ grade 2 was observed. Conclusions: Salvage CIRT provided relatively safe and effective short-term outcome for patients with unresectable or in-completely resected RI-SPM, as compared to historical data on re-irradiation using the conventional photon beam technology. However, further improvement in both disease control and toxicity prevention is needed.

Indexed as

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT)radiation-induced malignancysarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36544688
PMCPMC9761151
OpenAlexW3023652379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.