Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544685›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in the prognosis and therapy response of patients with bladder cancer.

Ding Li, Xuan Wu, Xinxin Fan, Cheng Cheng, Dongbei Li, Wenzhou Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research progress of N1-methyladenosine RNA modification in cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Construction of prognostic risk model of bladder cancer based on cuproptosis-related long non-coding RNAs.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ding Li *Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuan Wu *Department of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinxin Fan *Department of Hematology, Zhengzhou Third People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Cheng ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Dongbei LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenzhou ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengzhou University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CNZhengzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cuproptosis is the recently defined regulatory cell death (RCD) that plays essential roles in tumorigenesis and progression. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate the gene expression through various means. However, the clinical value of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs in bladder cancer (BLCA) remains poorly described. Methods: We downloaded the transcriptome sequencing data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Univariate, multivariate, and lasso Cox regression analyses were performed to construct the prognostic risk signature, the predictive accuracy of which was validated in the subsequent independence and stratification analyses. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were used to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the signature to explore therapeutic vulnerabilities and potential targets in BLCA. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) were used to estimate the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We further explored the potential new drug-target candidates based on the half maximal inhibitory concentration for this patient population. Results: Fifteen cuproptosis-related lncRNAs significantly associated with survival were identified to construct the risk signature based on the normalized expression level and regression coefficient of each gene. The patients with BLCA and high-risk scores defined by the signature were associated with worse survival outcomes. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the 2 risk groups had different biological activity. Furthermore, the patients in the low-risk group exhibited a higher TMB index and a lower TIDE score. The sensitivity of multiple antitumor drugs was negatively related to risk score, including AR-42, AS605240, FK866, TAK-715, and tubastatin A, while the sensitivity of some antitumor drugs, such as AMG-706, BX-795, and RO-3306, were positively correlated with risk score. Conclusions: Our study established and verified a novel clinical risk signature with cuproptosis-related lncRNAs that may predict therapy response and prognosis with robust and stable accuracy in patients with BLCA and enhance the personalized management of this patient population.

Indexed as

Bladder cancer (BLCA)cuproptosisdrug sensitivitylong noncoding RNAs (lncRNA)risk signature

Identifiers

PMID36544685
PMCPMC9761144
OpenAlexW4311184490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.