Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544644›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Development and validation of the prediction models for preeclampsia: a retrospective, single-center, case-control study.

Xuhong Chen, Li Yuan, Zhen Ji, Xiyun Bian, Shaofang Hua

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuhong ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Li YuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhen JiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiyun BianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shaofang HuaDepartment of Obstetrics, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Fifth Tianjin Central Hospital · CNSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of adverse maternal and infant outcomes. Accurate screening of PE is currently the focus of clinical attention. This study aimed to develop a model for predicting PE. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted with 916 pregnant women who received care at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University (October 2018 to July 2020). Women were randomly divided into the training (n=680) and testing (n=236) sets based on a ratio of 3:1. Demographic and clinical data of women were collected. In training set, logistic regression (LR), classification tree (CT) model, and random forest (RF) algorithm were used to develop prediction models for PE. Using the testing set was to validate these prediction models. The predictive performance of three models were assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Of the total 916 women, 237 had PE. The family history of hypertension, pre-pregnancy body mass index (pBMI), blood pressure (BP) ≥130/80 mmHg in early pregnancy, age, chronic hypertension, and duration of hypertension were the predictors of PE. The AUCs for the LR, CT, and RF models were 0.778, 0.850, and 0.871, respectively (all P<0.05 for all pair-wise comparisons). The RF had the best predictive efficiency with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 79.6%, 94.7%, 79.6%, and 94.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The RF model could be a practical screening approach for predicting PE, which is helpful for clinicians to identify high-risk individuals and prevent the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

classification tree (CT) modellogistic regressionpredictive factorsPre-eclampsiarandom forest (RF) algorithm

Identifiers

PMID36544644
PMCPMC9761146
OpenAlexW4310811673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.