ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Clinical retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ear surgery for adhesive otitis media.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of surgical interventions in auditory rehabilitation for chronic otitis media: comparative between passive middle ear implants, bone conduction implants, and active middle ear systems.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Acquired Cholesteatoma by EAONO/JOS Staging.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the optimum surgical approach for treating adherent otitis media is debatable. The traditional treatment is usually performed by microscopic tympanoplasty combined with temporal myofascial tympanic tube placement. In recent years, the application of whole ear endoscopic surgery in the treatment of middle ear diseases has gradually increased, otoendoscopy has been used in the operation of adhesive otitis media, but its safety and effectiveness are still controversial. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with adhesive otitis media treated by endoscopic ear surgery (EES) in our hospital from January 2018 to July 2021 over a 6-month period post-surgery. Of the 17 patients, 8 were males and 9 were females (mean age, 53 years; age range, 24-70 years). There were 12 and 5 cases of adhesive otitis media involving the left and right ear, respectively. The patients had follow-up evaluations 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Results: A total of 17 patients with adhesive otitis were enrolled, including 1 patient with Dornhoffer stage II; 6 patients with stage III; and 10 patients with stage IV. Adhesive otitis media was combined with middle ear cholesteatoma in 4 patients (24%). Fourteen patients (82%) had disruption or interruption of the ossicular chain (8 malleus, 14 incus, and 4 stapes lesions), 11 of whom had artificial ossicular chain reconstruction [8 with partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (PORP) and 3 with total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (TORP) implantation]. All patients had good tympanic membrane and graft morphology, no invaginations, and no perforations. The mean postoperative air-conduction hearing threshold [49.06±22.15 dB hearing level (dB HL)] and mean air-bone gap (19.94±10.00 dB HL) were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values (65.29±21.53 and 32.53±8.21 dB HL, respectively; P<0.05). No recurrences, secondary cholesteatomas, or secondary surgeries were reported. Conclusions: EES seems to be a safe and effective surgical method for the management of adhesive otitis media. The study has limitations due to its small sample size and lack of controlled studies. It still needs to be proven in clinical randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.