Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544613›Full record

Trial reportNagoya journal of medical science2022

Incidence rate of chronic pain after 1.5-2 years of thoracotomy between paravertebral block versus epidural block: a cohort study.

Reona Mori, Takahiro Tamura, Shuichi Yokota, Saya Usami, Masahiko Ando, Yoko Kubo, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Reona MoriDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro TamuraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Shuichi YokotaDivision of Anesthesia, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Saya UsamiDivision of Anesthesia, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Masahiko AndoCenter for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoko KuboDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kimitoshi NishiwakiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paravertebral block and epidural block are frequently employed for post-thoracotomy pain relief. It is not clear which postoperative analgesia method is effective for the chronic pain after the postoperative long term progress. Our hypothesis was that paravertebral block would be more effective than epidural block for chronic pain 1.5-2 years after thoracotomy. A cohort study investigating postoperative pain was performed in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy between the ages of 20-80 year-old, employed for another randomized controlled trial. In previously study, the patients were randomly allocated into either the epidural block or paravertebral block group (

Indexed as

Chronic PainThoracotomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPostoperative PainQuality of LifeYoung Adultchronic painepiduralparavertebralthoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID36544613
PMCPMC9748327
OpenAlexW4312115374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.