ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
Three-dimensional reconstructing undersampled photoacoustic microscopy images using deep learning.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven super-resolution optoacoustic imaging via physically encoded signal acquisition.Research square · 2026Article
- Advances in photoacoustic imaging reconstruction and quantitative analysis for biomedical applications.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Review
- Photoacoustic Microscopy for Multiscale Biological System Visualization and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Spectral-distortion-suppressed deep learning for fiber sensor photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of high-performance photoacoustic microscopy systems.Photoacoustics · 2025Review
- UPAMNet: A unified network with deep knowledge priors for photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- High speed innovations in photoacoustic microscopy.Npj imaging · 2024Review
- Unveiling precision: a data-driven approach to enhance photoacoustic imaging with sparse data.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Sounding out the dynamics: a concise review of high-speed photoacoustic microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Editorial: Breaking the speed limits in photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Azimuth mapping of fibrous tissue in linear dichroism-sensitive photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Efficient label-freePhotoacoustics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial sampling density and data size are important determinants of the imaging speed of photoacoustic microscopy (PAM). Therefore, undersampling methods that reduce the number of scanning points are typically adopted to enhance the imaging speed of PAM by increasing the scanning step size. Since undersampling methods sacrifice spatial sampling density, by considering the number of data points, data size, and the characteristics of PAM that provides three-dimensional (3D) volume data, in this study, we newly reported deep learning-based fully reconstructing the undersampled 3D PAM data. The results of quantitative analyses demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits robustness and outperforms interpolation-based reconstruction methods at various undersampling ratios, enhancing the PAM system performance with 80-times faster-imaging speed and 800-times lower data size. The proposed method is demonstrated to be the closest model that can be used under experimental conditions, effectively shortening the imaging time with significantly reduced data size for processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.