Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544404›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2023

Are autistic people disadvantaged by the criminal justice system? A case comparison.

Rachel Slavny-Cross, Carrie Allison, Sarah Griffiths, Simon Baron-Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Slavny-CrossUniversity of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-6619
Carrie AllisonUniversity of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-2090
Sarah GriffithsUniversity College London (UCL), UK.
Simon Baron-CohenUniversity of Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lay abstractMost autistic people will never experience being arrested or charged with a crime, however for those who do tend to be less satisfied with the way they were treated. The purpose of this study was to find out if autistic people are being disadvantaged by the criminal justice system if they are arrested. Previous research has shown that autistic people may have difficulties communicating with the police. This study builds on this knowledge by uncovering why autistic people may not feel able to communicate with the police and whether the police made any adjustments to help them. This study also measures the impact of being involved with the criminal justice system on autistic people's mental health, such as stress, meltdowns and shutdowns. The results show that autistic people were not always given the support they felt they needed. For example, not all autistic people had an appropriate adult with them at the police station who could help to make sure they understood what was happening around them. Autistic people were also more likely to feel less able to cope with the stress and more likely to suffer meltdowns and shutdowns because of their involvement with the criminal justice system. We hope this study will help police officers and lawyers to better support autistic people if they become involved with the criminal justice system.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderCriminal LawMental HealthVulnerable PopulationsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCase-Control StudiesCommunication BarriersCrimeCriminalsFemaleHumansLawyersMalePersonal SatisfactionPoliceautismcriminal justicemeltdownreasonable adjustmentsshutdown

Identifiers

PMID36544404
PMCPMC10291366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.