Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544337›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2023

Prognostic Value of Combined Biomarkers in Patients With Heart Failure: The Heartmarker Score.

Jonna A van der Stam, Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Saskia L M van Loon, Natal A W van Riel, Lukas R Dekker, Arjen-Kars Boer, Patrick Houthuizen, Volkher Scharnhorst

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonna A van der StamClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-7303
Sjoerd BouwmeesterDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-2231
Saskia L M van LoonClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-872X
Natal A W van RielDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-4730
Lukas R DekkerDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-3716
Arjen-Kars BoerClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-1027
Patrick HouthuizenDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-3344
Volkher ScharnhorstClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1243-9251
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) biomarkers have prognostic value. The aim of this study was to combine HF biomarkers into an objective classification system for risk stratification of patients with HF. Methods: HF biomarkers were analyzed in a population of HF outpatients and expressed relative to their cut-off values (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] >1,000 pg/mL, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 [ST2] >35 ng/mL, growth differentiation factor-15 [GDF-15] >2,000 pg/mL, and fibroblast growth factor-23 [FGF-23] >95.4 pg/mL). Biomarkers that remained significant in multivariable analysis were combined to devise the Heartmarker score. The performance of the Heartmarker score was compared to the widely used New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification based on symptoms during ordinary activity. Results: HF biomarkers of 245 patients were analyzed, 45 (18%) of whom experienced the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or death. HF biomarkers were elevated more often in patients that reached the composite endpoint than in patients that did not reach the endpoint. NT-proBNP, ST2, and GDF-15 were independent predictors of the composite endpoint and were thus combined as the Heartmarker score. The event-free survival and distance covered in 6 minutes of walking decreased with an increasing Heartmarker score. Compared with the NYHA classification, the Heartmarker score was better at discriminating between different risk classes and had a comparable relationship to functional capacity. Conclusions: The Heartmarker score is a reproducible and intuitive model for risk stratification of outpatients with HF, using routine biomarker measurements.

Indexed as

Heart FailureBiomarkersFibroblast Growth Factor-23Growth Differentiation Factor 15HumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisBiomarkersFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23Growth Differentiation Factor 15Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)BiomarkersGrowth differentiation factor-15Heart failureN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptideSoluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2

Identifiers

PMID36544337
PMCPMC9791008
OpenAlexW4312114502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.