Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544126›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

A prospective observational study for a Federated Artificial Intelligence solution for moniToring mental Health status after cancer treatment (FAITH): study protocol.

Raquel Lemos, Sofia Areias-Marques, Pedro Ferreira, Philip O'Brien, María Eugenia Beltrán-Jaunsarás, Gabriela Ribeiro, Miguel Martín, María Del Monte-Millán, Sara López-Tarruella, Tatiana Massarrah and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A bibliometric analysis of mobile health in breast cancer care: trends, impact, and future directions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Raquel LemosChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sofia Areias-MarquesChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro FerreiraChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Philip O'BrienWaterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
María Eugenia Beltrán-JaunsarásLifeSTech, Department of Photonics and Bioengineering, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Gabriela RibeiroChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel MartínMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERONC, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
María Del Monte-MillánMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
Sara López-TarruellaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERONC, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Tatiana MassarrahMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, IiSGM, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Luís-FerreiraDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculdade de Ciências E Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Giuseppe FrauDeep Blue, Rome, Italy.
Stefanos VeniosSuite5 Data Intelligence Solutions Limited, Limassol, Cyprus.
Gary McManusWaterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Albino J Oliveira-MaiaChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. albino.maia@neuro.fchampalimaud.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5071-3007
Champalimaud Foundation · PTHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESWaterford Institute of Technology · IEDeep Blue (Italy) · ITUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

H2020 Health 875358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a common condition among cancer patients, across several points in the disease trajectory. Although presenting higher prevalence rates than the general population, it is often not reported or remains unnoticed. Moreover, somatic symptoms of depression are common in the oncological context and should not be dismissed as a general symptom of cancer. It becomes even more challenging to track psychological distress in the period after the treatment, where connection with the healthcare system typically becomes sporadic. The main goal of the FAITH project is to remotely identify and predict depressive symptoms in cancer survivors, based on a federated machine learning (ML) approach, towards optimization of privacy.

methodsFAITH will remotely analyse depression markers, predicting their negative trends. These markers will be treated in distinct categories, namely nutrition, sleep, activity and voice, assessed in part through wearable technologies. The study will include 300 patients who have had a previous diagnosis of breast or lung cancer and will be recruited 1 to 5 years after the end of primary cancer. The study will be organized as a 12-month longitudinal prospective observational cohort study, with monthly assessments to evaluate depression symptoms and quality of life among cancer survivors. The primary endpoint is the severity of depressive symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D) at months 3, 6, 9 and 12. Secondary outcomes include self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS scale), and perceived quality of life (EORTC questionnaires), at baseline and monthly. Based on the predictive models gathered during the study, FAITH will also aim at further developing a conceptual federated learning framework, enabling to build machine learning models for the prediction and monitoring of depression without direct access to user's personal data. DISCUSSION: Improvements in the objectivity of psychiatric assessment are necessary. Wearable technologies can provide potential indicators of depression and anxiety and be used for biofeedback. If the FAITH application is effective, it will provide healthcare systems with a novel and innovative method to screen depressive symptoms in oncological settings.

trial registrationTrial ID: ISRCTN10423782 . Date registered: 21/03/2022.

Indexed as

DepressionNeoplasmsAnxietyArtificial IntelligenceHumansObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceCancerDepressionFederated learningQuality of lifeRemote assessmentSurvivorshipWearables

Identifiers

PMID36544126
PMCPMC9769034
OpenAlexW4312045109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.