Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544079›Full record

Trial reportNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitating patients with foot drop symptoms after stroke and its correlation with somatosensory evoked potentials-a crossover randomised controlled trial.

Marko Mijic, Benedikt Schoser, Peter Young

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04767360 (Short-term Therapeutic Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Device Bioness L300 on the Somatosensory Cortical Representation in the Rehabilitation of Patients After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04767360 nacompletednot on this map

Short-term Therapeutic Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Device Bioness L300 on the Somatosensory Cortical Representation in the Rehabilitation of Patients After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorLMU KlinikumRan2021 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsStrokeArmsBioness-300
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marko MijicDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Marko.Mijic@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7064-0471
Benedikt SchoserDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Klinikum der Universität, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8131
Peter YoungClinic for Neurology, Medical Park, Reithof 1, 83075, Bad Feilnbach, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe connectivity between somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical plasticity remains elusive due to a lack of supporting data. This study investigates changes in pathological latencies and amplitudes of SEPs caused by an acute stroke after 2 weeks of rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation (FES). Furthermore, changes in SEPs and the efficacy of FES against foot drop (FD) stroke symptoms were correlated using the 10-m walk test and foot-ankle strength.

methodsA randomised controlled two-period crossover design plus a control group (group C) was designed. Group A (n = 16) was directly treated with FES, while group B (n = 16) was treated after 2 weeks. The untreated control group of 20 healthy adults underwent repeated SEP measurements for evaluation only.

resultsThe repeated-measures ANOVA showed a decrease in tibial nerve (TN) P40 and N50 latencies in group A after the intervention, followed by a decline in non-paretic TN SEP in latency N50 (p < 0.05). Moreover, compared to groups B and C from baseline to 4 weeks, group A showed a decrease in paretic TN latency P40 and N50 (p < 0.05). An increase in FD strength and a reduction in step cadence in group B (p < 0.05) and a positive tendency in FD strength (p = 0.12) and step cadence (p = 0.08) in group A were observed after the treatment time. The data showed a moderate (r = 0.50-0.70) correlation between non-paretic TN latency N50 and step cadence in groups A and B after the intervention time.

conclusionThe FES intervention modified the pathological gait in association with improved SEP afferent feedback. Registered on 25 February 2021 on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier number: NCT04767360.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyPeroneal NeuropathiesStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryHumansFunctional electrical stimulationNeuroprosthesesSensory and motor recoverySomatosensory evoked potentialsStroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36544079
PMCPMC10023639
OpenAlexW4312064363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.