Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544075›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2023

Final Results from a Phase 2b Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of RBX2660: A Microbiota-Based Drug for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Erik R Dubberke, Robert Orenstein, Sahil Khanna, Beth Guthmueller, Christine Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02299570 (A Phase 2B Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study Demonstrating the Efficacy and Safety of Rebiotix RBX2660), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02299570 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2B Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study Demonstrating the Efficacy and Safety of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRebiotix Inc.Ran2014 to 2018Enrolled150ConditionsEnterocolitis Clostridium Difficile RecurrentArmsRBX2660 (microbiota suspension), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of fecal microbiota, live (RBL) for the prevention of recurrentJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Prevention of recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Safety and effectiveness of fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTATherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik R DubberkeWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. edubberk@wustl.edu.
Robert OrensteinMayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sahil KhannaMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Beth GuthmuellerRebiotix, Inc., Roseville, MN, USA.
Christine LeeUniversity of Victoria and British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
Mayo Clinic Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Victoria · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective treatments for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) are urgently needed. RBX2660 is an investigational microbiota-based live biotherapeutic to reduce CDI recurrence following standard-of-care antibiotic treatment in individuals with rCDI. Here we report the final safety data through 24 months of follow-up as well as final efficacy data, reflecting alignment of the pre-specified statistical analysis plan definitions with the data presented.

methodsThe PUNCH CD2 clinical trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, three-arm phase 2b study conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RBX2660 for the reduction of rCDI compared to placebo. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and had at least three episodes of CDI and at least two rounds of standard antibiotic treatment or had at least two episodes of severe CDI resulting in hospitalization. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to group A, two doses of RBX2660; group B, two doses of placebo; or group C, one dose of RBX2660 and one dose of placebo; all administered 7 ± 2 days apart. Treatment success was prevention of recurrence, defined as absence of diarrhea and no re-treatment for CDI any time after the first dose until 8 weeks after the second dose of the study treatment. Safety was assessed by reports of adverse events and symptoms. The final efficacy and safety are reported for data available through 24 months.

resultsFor the primary endpoint, treatment success at 8 weeks, 56.8% (25/45) of participants who received one dose of RBX2660 + one dose of placebo, 55.6% (25/45) of participants who received two doses of RBX2660, and 43.2% (19/44) of participants who received two doses of placebo in the final intention-to-treat (ITT) population were responders (both p = 0.2 vs placebo). In the per-protocol population, 87.5% (21/24) of participants who received one dose of RBX2660 + one dose of placebo and 58.1% (18/31) of those who received two doses of placebo had treatment success (p = 0.017; treatment difference, 29.4 [95% CI 7.6, 51.3]); 75.0% (21/28) of participants in the PP population who received two doses of RBX2660 were responders (p = 0.17 vs placebo). The safety profile of RBX2660, whether delivered as one or two doses, was similar to the placebo group.

conclusionWhile the phase 2b PUNCH CD2 clinical trial did not meet its pre-defined primary endpoint of treatment success at 8 weeks after two doses of RBX2660 vs two doses of placebo, clinically meaningful data were obtained to justify proceeding with the single dose regimen in the phase 3 clinical trial, PUNCH CD3, now complete. To date, the cumulative data for RBX2660 demonstrate consistent efficacy and safety outcomes for reduction of CDI recurrence in adults. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02299570.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium difficileLive biotherapeutic productMicrobiotaRBX2660Recurrent CDI

Identifiers

PMID36544075
PMCPMC9925615
OpenAlexW4312094178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.