ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
High-resolution 3D T2-weighted SPACE sequence with compressed sensing for the prostate gland: diagnostic performance in comparison with conventional T2-weighted images.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-tumor radiomics analysis of T2-weighted imaging in differentiating neuroblastoma from ganglioneuroblastoma/ganglioneuroma in children: an exploratory study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Trial
- Toward a Refined PI-RADS: The Feasibility and Limitations of More Informative Metrics in Reviewing MRI Scans.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate employing echo planar imaging with compressed SENSE based reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of PI-RADSv2.1 using multiparametric and biparametric MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Compressed sensing 3D T2WI radiomics model: improving diagnostic performance in muscle invasion of bladder cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the diagnostic performance of high-resolution 3D T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) with compressed sensing (CS) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) to that of conventional T2WI with turbo spin echo (TSE) in prostate MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study evaluated 179 patients (mean age 69.1 ± 9.3) who underwent prostate biopsy after prostate prebiopsy MRI, including two sets of three-plane T2WI with TSE (thickness: 3 mm, scan time: 10 min 4 s) and CS SPACE (thickness: 0.6 mm, scan time: 4 min 55 s). Two radiologists evaluated two sets of images with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) classification and determined the extraprostatic extension (EPE) of the lesion. The diagnostic performance to detect prostate cancer (PIRADS classification) and EPE was compared between the two T2WI sets.
resultsClinically significant cancer (CSC) was diagnosed in 103 patients (57.5%). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PIRADS classification on both image sets with T2 TSE and T2 CS SPACE were higher than 0.7 and did not show significant differences for either radiologist (p > 0.05). EPE was confirmed in 25 of 70 patients underwent prostatectomy. For evaluating EPE on MRI, the sensitivity and specificity did not differ between the two T2WI sequences (p > 0.05).
conclusionHigh-resolution 3D T2WI using CS SPACE, which was acquired within a shorter acquisition time than three-plane T2 TSE, showed comparable diagnostic performance to conventional T2 TSE for detecting CSC and evaluating EPE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36544053What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.