Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544050›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023

Enhanced Recovery After Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under Sedation, Intercostal Block and Tumescent Anaesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Early Postoperative Phase.

Stéphane Stahl, Adelana Santos Stahl, You-Shan Feng, Arne Estler, Kamil Swoboda, Florian Buiculescu, Ana Cristina Seabra Robalo Gomes Jorge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stéphane StahlCenterPlast Private Practice, Bahnhofstraße 36, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Adelana Santos StahlCenterPlast Private Practice, Bahnhofstraße 36, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
You-Shan FengInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, Medical University of Tübingen, Silcherstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Arne EstlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Kamil SwobodaCenterPlast Private Practice, Bahnhofstraße 36, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Florian BuiculescuCenterPlast Private Practice, Bahnhofstraße 36, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Ana Cristina Seabra Robalo Gomes JorgeDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. ana.cristina.g.jorge@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-2337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComfort and recovery are major concerns of patients seeking aesthetic surgery. This study aimed to assess postoperative pain and recovery after outpatient breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and local anaesthesia.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery between April 2021 and August 2022. Epidemiological data, anaesthesia, pain, and patients' satisfaction were systematically assessed with standardized self-assessment questionnaires.

resultsAltogether, 48 patients [median (IQR) age: 30 (36-25)] were included. The most frequent surgery was mastopexy. 69% of surgeries involved additional procedures. The mean intercostal block and local anaesthesia time was 15 min. Patients received a median (IQR) of 19 (34-2) mg/kg lidocaine and 2.3 (2.5-2.0) mg/kg ropivacaine. The median (IQR) consumption of propofol and alfentanil was, respectively, 4.89 (5.48-4.26) mg/kg/h and 0.27 (0.39-0.19) µg/kg/min. No conversion to general anaesthesia or unplanned hospital admission occurred. Patients were discharged after a median (IQR) of 2:40 (3:43-1:58) hours. Within the first 24 postoperative hours, 17% required once an antiemetic medication and 38% an opioid. Patients were very satisfied with the anaesthesia and 90% of the patients had not wished more analgesia in the first 24 h.

conclusionsAesthetic breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and tumescent anaesthesia can safely be performed as an ambulatory procedure and is associated with minimal intra- and postoperative opioid consumption and high patient satisfaction. These data may be used to inform patients and clinicians and improve the overall quality of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBreast NeoplasmsAdultAnesthesia, LocalEstheticsFemaleHumansProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBreast surgeryEnhanced recovery after surgeryFast recovery surgeryFast track surgeryIntercostal blockParasternal block

Identifiers

PMID36544050
PMCPMC9770569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.