Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544029›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype.

Ismail Bilal Masokano, Yigang Pei, Juan Chen, Wenguang Liu, Simin Xie, Huaping Liu, Deyun Feng, Qiongqiong He, Wenzheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ismail Bilal Masokano *Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Yigang Pei *Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Juan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Wenguang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Simin XieDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Huaping LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Deyun FengDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Qiongqiong HeDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Wenzheng LiDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. wz.li@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-0097
Central South University · CN

Funding

Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department 2018XK2304Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071895Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China 2019M652807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma (MTHCC) has a poor prognosis and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The purpose is to build and validate MRI-based models to predict the MTHCC subtype.

methodsTwo hundred eight patients with confirmed HCC were enrolled. Three models (model 1: clinicoradiologic model; model 2: fusion radiomics signature; model 3: combined model 1 and model 2) were built based on their clinical data and MR images to predict MTHCC in training and validation cohorts. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the models was estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed, and its calibration was evaluated.

resultsModel 1 is easier to build than models 2 and 3, with a good AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.696-0.838) and 0.801 (95% CI 0.681-0.891) in predicting MTHCC in training and validation cohorts, respectively. It performed slightly superior to model 2 in both training (AUC 0.747; 95% CI 0.689-0.806; p = 0.548) and validation (AUC 0.718; 95% CI 0.618-0.810; p = 0.089) cohorts and was similar to model 3 in the validation (AUC 0.866; 95% CI 0.801-0.928; p = 0.321) but inferior in the training (AUC 0.889; 95% CI 0.851-0.926; p = 0.001) cohorts. The DCA of model 1 had a higher net benefit than the treat-all and treat-none strategy at a threshold probability of 10%. The calibration curves of model 1 closely aligned with the true MTHCC rates in the training (p = 0.355) and validation sets (p = 0.364).

conclusionThe clinicoradiologic model has a good performance in diagnosing MTHCC, and it is simpler and easier to implement, making it a valuable tool for pretherapeutic decision-making in patients.

Indexed as

Decision-makingMacrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingNomograms

Identifiers

PMID36544029
PMCPMC9772375
OpenAlexW4312059548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.