Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544017›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2022

Toward "bigger" data for neurosurgical anatomical research: a single centralized quantitative neurosurgical anatomy platform.

Lena Mary Houlihan, David Naughton, Michael G J O'Sullivan, Michael T Lawton, Mark C Preul

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lena Mary HoulihanThe Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
David NaughtonThe Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Michael G J O'SullivanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Michael T LawtonThe Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Mark C PreulThe Loyal and Edith Davis Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA. Neuropub@barrowneuro.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative neurosurgical anatomy research aims to produce surgically applicable knowledge for improving operative decision-making using measurements from anatomical dissection and tools such as stereotaxis. Although such studies attempt to answer similar research questions, there is little standardization between them, offering minimal comparability. Modern technology has been incorporated into the research methodology, but many scientific principles are lacking, and results are not broadly applicable or suitable for evaluating big-data trends. Advances in information technology and the concept of big data permit more accessible and robust means of producing valuable, standardized, reliable research. A technology project, "Inchin," is presented to address these needs for neurosurgical anatomy research. This study applies the concept of big data to neurosurgical anatomy research, specifically in quantifying surgical metrics. A remote-hosted web application was developed for computing standard neurosurgical metrics and storing measurement data. An online portal (Inchin) was developed to produce a database to facilitate and promote neurosurgical anatomical research, applying optimal scientific methodology and big-data principles to this recent and evolving field of research. Individual data sets are not insignificant, but a collective of data sets present advantages. Large data sets allow confidence in data trends that are usually obscured in smaller numbers of samples. Inchin, a single centralized software platform, can act as a global database of results of neurosurgical anatomy studies. A calculation tool ensuring standardized peer-reviewed methodology, Inchin is applied to the analysis of neurosurgical metrics and may promote efficient study collaboration within and among neurosurgical laboratories.

Indexed as

Big DataSoftwareDatabases, FactualDissectionHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalAnatomical 3-dimensional modelingAnatomical quantitationBig dataNeurosurgical anatomyOnline anatomic analysisSurgical approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.