ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Technical challenges and surgical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in patients with upper lumbar disc herniation: a prospective clinical study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUpper lumbar disc herniation (ULDH) constitutes a considerably complex and rare anatomic entity. As such, there are only a handful of studies investigating the application of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the management of this cause of low back pain. RESEARCH QUESTION: To elucidate the safety and effectiveness of PTED in patients with ULDH. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-six (26) individuals with diagnosed ULDH (L1-L2, L2-L3) according to clinical and radiologic criteria were prospectively evaluated in a 2-year follow-up period. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical evaluation was conducted with visual analogue scale for lower limb (VAS-LP) and low back (VAS-BP) pain in conjunction with Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Medical Health Survey Questionnaire. Potential complications were recorded in each follow-up interval.
resultsOne patient (3.8%) featured temporary postoperative dysesthesia that was completely resolved at 6 weeks. No other major perioperative complications were observed. Values of all studied indices were found to be statistically significantly ameliorated at the end of follow-up. Improvement was depicted to be quantitatively maximal at 6 weeks postoperatively.
conclusionsPTED constitutes a safe and effective technique for surgical management of ULDH that merits further assessment in current clinical practice in the framework of multicenter randomized controlled trials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.